Thank you for not smoking

I am amazed. Very amazed, in fact, with the way law gets twisted and stretched to fit the blubber of archaic moral policing in my country, barely concealing the obscene, and yet, covering up just right. OK, there were five commas in the last sentence. So what?

I spent the three weeks in Delhi fretting over the minute details of, and the general public opinion about, the brand new anti-smokers’ law. October 2nd meant carrying coffee in a snooty paper cup to the car and looking at the sorrow-crowd outside the purple-red cafe. The day spoke to my kind in whispers of a foreign language and the only word we could catch was ‘discrimination’.

Oh, I’m totally against curbing rights, even if they are of non-smokers forced to duel armours of nicotine rings which them smokers have around themselves in self-defence. Well, I still do not see why the addict needs to leave his drink mid-way and run down four floors for his fix by the roadside when the bar could’ve have a separate non-smoking floor if it weren’t for law. Will the law-churners protect the girl in the short-skirt stepping out at 2 am from the club to light up her Classic Milds? Maybe she shouldn’t try such ‘adventures’ when ‘the streets aren’t safe in the city’ (quoting Ms. Sheila Dikshit).

Whats a woman’s doing with a cigarette anyway? Aren’t we Indian women supposed to ‘maintain dignity’ and ‘values’ and simply indulge in some quality bitching and schemeing when we wanna have a little fun? Ooh, I can almost imagine Ekta Kapoor’s vamp in a saree (and slutty make-up) lighting up with a flashy smirk, while schemeing to take over her in-laws’ bank-balance right after making love to her chocolate-boy (and negative IQ’d) husband.

Anyways, coming back to the law which thinks roads aren’t public enough and private cars with windows rolled down are, I think I need a smoke break. Will see if I become poorer by 200 bucks in the process.

13 comments so far

  1. Amster on

    a PARK is ok, a ROAD is ok, a PAVEMENT is ok.

    But your private car – uho! no.
    But a cafe in a park open air n all – uho! no.

    Shoot me now – everywhere is a nuisance to go to.

    AND WOMEN SMOKE IN THIS COUNTRY!!!? no way – surely… *mock disbelief*

  2. Gary on

    I need a smoke! or rather I want to burn something!

  3. Joe on

    Completely agree with you gary, start a movement if you will? surely there have to be smokers rights or something!

  4. Mister Crowley on

    O tempora o mores…..sigh

  5. mona emanvel on

    the following has nothing to do with your blog…..where r u?????….u havent called and i cant get through to your damn phone!!

  6. Nikhil on

    Apparently, open roads aren’t public places… What a load of crap! :D
    And Mona’s comment is the cutest in wordpress history! :lol:

  7. mona emanvel on

    @nikhil – why is it cute?…the only place i can get my mesg across to her when her phone is not working,is here!…hehehe

  8. mona emanvel on

    time for a new blog binie…

  9. Trailblazer on

    Smokers should be left alone. It’s completely upto the individual. The current law doesn’t make much sense.

  10. Viraj on

    i second what nikhil has to say :roll:

    i think even the terrace and the parks and a lot of other places arent public places…

    and i dont see any reason why smoking should be banned…. its all about the survival of the fittest… :mrgreen:

  11. blueandgrey on

    love it… :mrgreen:

  12. Avionic Spanker on

    So did u become poorer by 200 bucks or not?

  13. Ruchi Mahna on

    Beg to disagree here… Curbing rights isn’t justice for sure.

    However, probably, unknowingly the govt. is trying to do good by reasoning the increasing amt. of deaths caused due to smoking. Active as well as passive!! Ya there cud be another way out with it for smokers,allowing smoking zones or a separate closed environment be provided for it maybe


Leave a reply